Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Blue | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus is better than Galaxy J7 Star, having an 82.6 score against 73.1. The Moto G 5G Plus is a newer phone than Galaxy J7 Star, although it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much greater screen pixel density, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a larger display. Moto G 5G Plus has a much greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal storage.
The Moto G 5G Plus has a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a way higher (4K) video definition, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.