Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Power is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, having a 76.1 score against 73.1. The Motorola Moto G Power construction is newer, but thicker and just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto G Power has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a brighter display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a bigger screen, a much better 1080 x 2300 resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch in the display. The Moto G Power has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G Power features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Moto G Power also has more RAM memory. Moto G Power shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Moto G Power also has a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger sensor.
The Moto G Power has a way better battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Moto G Power is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.