Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Blue | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G100 has a general score of 88.9, which is much better than Galaxy J7 Star's global score of 73.1. Both devices in this review come with Android OS, but the Moto G100 has an older 11 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. Moto G100 is a a lot newer phone than the Galaxy J7 Star, although it's thicker and heavier.
Moto G100 has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a bigger display, way more pixels per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels. The Moto G100 features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Moto G100 counts with a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the Moto G100 also has a larger amount of RAM. Moto G100 captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Moto G100 also has a much better 5760x3240 video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality photographs and videos and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Moto G100 has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.