Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue | Blue and Red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G7 Plus is a bit better than the Galaxy J7 Star, having a global score of 76.1 against 73.1. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Moto G7 Plus has older 10 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. Moto G7 Plus's body is just a little bit lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy J7 Star, even though both were only released with a few months difference.
The Motorola Moto G7 Plus counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Moto G7 Plus has a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way greater count of pixels per display inch, a little larger screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2270px.
The Moto G7 Plus captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Moto G7 Plus also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger sensor taking better quality photographs and videos and a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto G7 Plus features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy J7 Star has just a little better battery life than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.