Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Blue | Oxford blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, having a score of 84.6 against 73.1. Motorola One 5G is a extremely newer phone than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, but it is just a bit thicker and heavier. The Motorola One 5G counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a bigger screen, a lot better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a way higher pixels density.
Motorola One 5G features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola One 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola One 5G shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola One 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Motorola One 5G features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. The Motorola One 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Motorola One 5G, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy J7 Star, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.