Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action is a little bit better than Galaxy J7 Star, with a overall score of 78.5 against 73.1. Even though the Motorola One Action is a little thicker than the Galaxy J7 Star, it's a little bit lighter and newer. Motorola One Action counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Action also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Action features a sharper display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much higher pixels density, a little bit larger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2520 resolution. The Motorola One Action has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola One Action shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture and a less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way better video definition. Motorola One Action counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola One Action, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy J7 Star, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.