Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than Galaxy J7 Star, with a 79.8 score against 73.1. These phones include Android OS, but the Motorola One Hyper has 11 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola One Hyper is a newer device than the Galaxy J7 Star, but it is a little bit heavier and a bit thicker.
The Motorola One Hyper features a much better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a larger screen, a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Motorola One Hyper counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Hyper also has more RAM. Motorola One Hyper counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.