Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a score of 80, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 global score. Motorola One Zoom's construction is newer, but just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. The Motorola One Zoom has a bit better CPU than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola One Zoom has a much better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a bigger screen, a way greater display pixels density and a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Motorola One Zoom features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports 272 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Motorola One Zoom shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot higher video resolution and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera. Motorola One Zoom counts with better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.