Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, getting an 87 score against 73.1. Motorola razr (2020) is a incredibly newer and a little bit thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, although it's a little heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 876 x 2142px.
Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy J7 Star has greater battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.