Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 15 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | -- |
| TFT | LTPO |
| 267 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, with a overall score of 79.2 against 73.1. These devices come with Android OS, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has older 15 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a a lot newer and notably thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, although it's a bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features a lot better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a really smaller screen. Galaxy J7 Star has a much faster processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot higher video quality. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.