Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView is just a bit better than Galaxy J7 Star, with a 76.4 score against 73.1. The Nokia 9 PureView is a a little thinner and just a bit lighter phone than Galaxy J7 Star, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a much better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a quite larger display, a lot higher display pixels density and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Nokia 9 PureView has a greater performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Nokia 9 PureView takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures and videos. The Nokia 9 PureView and Galaxy J7 Star have similar battery durations, although the Nokia 9 PureView also has 3320mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy J7 Star. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Galaxy J7 Star, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.