Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Blue | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is better than Galaxy J7 Star, getting a global score of 80.8 against 73.1. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia XR20 has 11 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although the Nokia XR20 is way newer than the Galaxy J7 Star, it's thicker and noticeably heavier.
The Nokia XR20 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Nokia XR20 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Nokia XR20 features a sharper display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a bigger screen, a lot better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a better number of pixels per inch of display.
The Nokia XR20 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, higher video frame rates and a lot better resolution back camera.
Nokia XR20 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy J7 Star. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.