Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, getting a 79.4 score against 73.1. Galaxy A35 5G's body is a lot newer and just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's, although it's also somewhat heavier. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Galaxy A35 5G has the previous 14 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a larger display and a higher screen density. Galaxy A35 5G has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy J7 Star counts with a very superior processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.