Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, with a general score of 81.7 against 73.1. The Galaxy A41 design is newer, somewhat lighter and a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A41 has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A41 has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A41 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot greater screen pixel density, a little bit larger screen and a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A41 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera, a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy A41 counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A41 has a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 6 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.