Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is way better than Galaxy J7 Star's general score of 73.1. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy A52 5G is a extremely newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy J7 Star, but it's just a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G has a better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a much higher screen pixels density and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing photos or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a way bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 36% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.