Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's score of 73.1. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is newer and incredibly thinner, but way heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. Both of these phones work with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so both of them should provide the user all the same operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot larger screen, a lot better 1536 x 2152 resolution and a higher display pixel density. The Galaxy Fold features a superior CPU than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 10 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features better battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
Galaxy Fold has a better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light environments and a much higher video definition.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.