Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, having a general score of 90.8 against 73.1. Even though Galaxy Note 20 is just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, it's a bit thinner and way newer. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a more powerful CPU than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a sharper display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, more pixels per inch of screen and a bigger display. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera and a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a way higher video definition.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features longer battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.