Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than Galaxy J7 Star, having an 89 score against 73.1. Galaxy Note10 is a newer phone, and it's also just a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Galaxy J7 Star. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2280px, a quite larger screen and a better screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a superior processing unit than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note10 features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note10 has a superior camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a camera in the back with less MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light environments, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.