Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than Galaxy J7 Star, with a score of 79.5 against 73.1. Samsung Galaxy Note7's construction is just a bit thinner and a little lighter than Galaxy J7 Star, although it was released 2 years before. Galaxy Note7 has a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot more pixels per display inch, a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note7 features a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a camera with a lower 12 MP resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 also counts with a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.