Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's score of 73.1. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S10 is a lighter and a little bit thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, even when both were only released 8 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a little bit bigger screen and a much higher pixel amount per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a more powerful CPU than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a way higher video definition, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a bigger aperture. The Galaxy S10 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB and more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 costs a lot more money than the Galaxy J7 Star, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.