Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 Star, having a score of 89.7 against 73.1. Even though the Galaxy S10 Lite is just a bit heavier than Galaxy J7 Star, it's a bit thinner and newer. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a larger screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a greater pixels count in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has 6 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back, a way larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Galaxy S10 Lite has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Galaxy S10 Lite costs a lot more than the Galaxy J7 Star, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.