Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 general score. Even when the Samsung Galaxy S10e and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star were released only a couple months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S10e is lighter and a little thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a brighter display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, a lot greater display density and a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10e has a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10e also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a camera in the back with less megapixels, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos, a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations.
The Galaxy J7 Star counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S10e, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy J7 Star, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.