Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 score. The Galaxy S20 FE body is notably newer and a little bit thinner than Galaxy J7 Star's, but it's just a little bit heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S20 FE has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot greater pixels count per inch in the screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger screen. Galaxy S20 FE has a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 FE has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S20 FE takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 36% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S20 FE, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy J7 Star, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.