Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is way better than the Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 overall score. The Galaxy S22 is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also a little lighter and thinner than the Galaxy J7 Star. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S22 features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 counts with a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a little larger screen, a way higher count of pixels per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S22 has a little bit better memory for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S22 has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy J7 Star. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.