Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-13 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.38 ounces | -- |
| Blue | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is much better than Galaxy J7 Star, with a overall score of 82.6 against 73.1. Samsung Galaxy S25's design is notably thinner and lighter than Galaxy J7 Star. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot better amount of pixels per inch of display, a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little larger screen.
The Galaxy S25 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much bigger sensor, a much better video quality and a camera with a way higher 50 MP resolution. The Galaxy S25 counts with a slightly bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S25, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy J7 Star, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.