Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than Galaxy J7 Star, with an 88.5 score against 73.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body is newer and thinner, but a little heavier than the Galaxy J7 Star. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a larger display, a much better pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a lot better 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip has a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a camera with less mega-pixels and a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a way better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip count with incredibly similar batteries performance.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.