Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's score of 73.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, although it is just a bit heavier. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a bigger display. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a quite better processing power than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a camera in the back with less mega-pixels and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a larger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a battery duration that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star one.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy J7 Star, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.