Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2024-09-26 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a score of 84.5, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 global score. Xiaomi 14T Pro's construction is much newer and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's, but it is also somewhat heavier. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi 14T Pro has an older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way better 1220 x 2712px resolution, a larger screen and a way higher display density. Xiaomi 14T Pro features much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy J7 Star features a much faster CPU than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi 14T Pro shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera, a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger camera sensor and a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations.
Xiaomi 14T Pro has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.