Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is way better than Galaxy J7 Star, getting a general score of 90.1 against 73.1. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Galaxy J7 Star.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3120px resolution, a much better display pixel density and a bigger display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a camera in the back with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.