Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Blue | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| -- | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, getting a 90.7 score against 73.1. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a notably newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, although it's also notably heavier. These phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a faster processing unit than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much better display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot higher quantity of pixels per display inch, a larger display and a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a much better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs, a back camera with a much better resolution and a way better video definition.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.