Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-13 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Max has a global score of 77.5, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 general score. Despite of the fact Xiaomi Mi Max is notably older and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, it's design is still somewhat thinner. The Xiaomi Mi Max has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Max also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Max features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a greater pixel density, a bigger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 1920px resolution. Xiaomi Mi Max shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a more MP camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Mi Max features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a SD card slot that admits 144 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Max features a superior battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 4850mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.