Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-08-10 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Blue | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a global score of 89, which is a lot better than Galaxy J7 Star's overall score of 73.1. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 design is way newer and a little thinner than Galaxy J7 Star's, but it is heavier. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has the previous 11 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 features a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a much better display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a higher pixels quantity per display inch, a bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs, a lot higher video resolution and a way better 108 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with slightly more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 36 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.