Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is better than Galaxy J7 Star, with an 84.3 score against 73.1. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has the previous 14 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 body is newer and thinner than Galaxy J7 Star's, but it's somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 10 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a lot bigger screen, a lot higher 2224 x 2488 pixels resolution and a much higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.