Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is way better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, with a overall score of 87.9 against 73.1. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a higher pixel count per inch in the screen, a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bigger screen.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a slightly bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos in low light environments, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos, a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.