Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Blue | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F3 is better than the Galaxy J7 Star, having an 87.3 score against 73.1. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F3 has an older 11 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie. The Xiaomi Poco F3 body is way newer and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy J7 Star's, but it is a little heavier.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a superior processing unit than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F3 has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a greater pixels number per inch of screen, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger screen.
Xiaomi Poco F3 has just a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco F3 has a way better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor.
Xiaomi Poco F3 features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 37 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.