Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is much better than Galaxy J7 Star, getting an 83.4 score against 73.1. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro design is much newer than the Galaxy J7 Star's, but it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has an older 11 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a greater performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, more pixels per inch in the screen and a larger screen.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 56% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.