Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi 9T is a little bit better than the Galaxy J7 Star, getting a general score of 78.2 against 73.1. Although Xiaomi Redmi 9T is a lot newer than the Galaxy J7 Star, it is somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier. Both devices we are comparing work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi 9T has the older 10 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution, more pixels per screen inch and a bigger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has an 82% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.