Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an overall score of 82.4, which is better than Galaxy J7 Star's overall score of 73.1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a way newer and a bit thinner device than Galaxy J7 Star, but it's also a little heavier. These phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an older 11 version and Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a better display pixel density, a way higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy J7 Star, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.