Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a global score of 78.2, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 global score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S body is incredibly newer, a little lighter and a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a much sharper display than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way greater pixels density, a bigger display and a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low light situations, it also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels. The Galaxy J7 Star features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 400 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 52% more battery size.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy J7 Star. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy J7 Star, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.