Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, having an 81.1 score against 73.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's, but it is a little bit thicker and heavier. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher video definition, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a way better resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 52% more battery size.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy J7 Star. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy J7 Star, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.