Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a general score of 83, which is much better than Galaxy J7 Star's 73.1 general score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has 10 version while Galaxy J7 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a extremely newer cellphone than Galaxy J7 Star, although it is a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a little better performance than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a bigger screen and a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB and more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.