Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 67 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2018-07-13 | 2017-11-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.02 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 110.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite, having a global score of 73.1 against 67. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite has Android 7.0 Nougat. Despite being the best in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite, and although they both have 2 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star also has more cpu cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star. Both have a screen with the same size, the same exact resolution of 720 x 1280 and the same count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same resolution back camera and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star also has a much bigger camera aperture to take better images and video in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite, because it has 16 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Y1 Lite, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3080mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy J7 Star is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.