Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max is better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), having a overall score of 85.3 against 71.9. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy J7 V (2018) comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. The iPhone 11 Pro Max construction is newer and just a little thinner than the Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s, although it's somewhat heavier.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a greater performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has 2 lesser cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64 bits CPU. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a much better screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a larger display, a much greater screen pixels density and a lot better 1242 x 2688 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 400 GB. IPhone 11 Pro Max features superior battery performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 3969mAh battery size.
IPhone 11 Pro Max captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot better video definition.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.