Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 9.x |
| 2018-06-07 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 6s has a global score of 83, which is much better than Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s global score of 71.9. The Apple iPhone 6s has iOS 9.x operating system, while Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. Apple iPhone 6s is an older cellphone than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but Apple made it somewhat thinner and way lighter anyway.
IPhone 6s counts with a better performing processor than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have 2 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 6s also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a graphics processor. IPhone 6s has an incredibly better display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1334 x 750 pixels resolution and a just a bit higher pixel density.
IPhone 6s has slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. IPhone 6s captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a camera with less MP resolution and a way tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a way higher video quality.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) features a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 1715mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 6s is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.