Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 9.x |
| 2018-06-07 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 6s Plus is better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), with a general score of 84.2 against 71.9. IPhone 6s Plus works with iOS 9.x operating system, while Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. IPhone 6s Plus is a way older and just a little bit heavier cellphone than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but Apple could make it thinner anyway.
IPhone 6s Plus counts with a way better screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the iPhone 6s Plus also has a lot more pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1920 x 1080. IPhone 6s Plus features a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 6s Plus also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a graphics processor.
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a less mega-pixels camera and a lot tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography, it also counts with a way higher video definition. The iPhone 6s Plus has a little bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with improved battery performance than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a 20 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 6s Plus is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.