Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s 71.9 overall score. IPhone 8 Plus's construction is thinner but somewhat heavier than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), and they were released with only a couple months difference. IPhone 8 Plus has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the iPhone 8 Plus also has a much better 1080 x 1920px resolution and a way higher display pixels density.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a superior processing unit than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and 1 GB more RAM. IPhone 8 Plus has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in low light environments and a back-facing camera with less MP resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
IPhone 8 Plus features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) features greater battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2691mAh.
Although iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy J7 V (2018). If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy J7 V (2018), letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.