Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s score of 71.9. Apple iPhone XS is a a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner device than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), even when they were only released 4 months apart. IPhone XS features a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with more RAM and a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone XS has a way better looking display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a much greater pixel density, a lot better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little bit larger display. The Apple iPhone XS has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a back-facing camera with less MP resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 400 GB. The Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with superior battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 2659mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.