Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s global score of 71.9. These phones work with Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has 11 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Google Pixel 3a's body is newer, just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Galaxy J7 V (2018).
The Google Pixel 3a features a more vivid display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2220, a bit larger screen and a way better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) features a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 400 GB.
Google Pixel 3a has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 3a also has more RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a camera with a lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking images or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) has a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.