Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is way better than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting an 87.5 score against 71.9. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also a little thinner and a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018).
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a sharper display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has much more pixels per display inch, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit larger display. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little faster CPU than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a back camera with a worse resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a way higher video resolution. Google Pixel 4a 5G has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.