Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | S-LCD 3 |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is just a bit better than Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting a overall score of 77.7 against 71.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version while Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo. HTC One M9 is a noticeably older and somewhat thicker cellphone than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but HTC was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway.
The HTC One M9 counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Galaxy J7 V (2018) features more memory for games and applications than HTC One M9, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage, the Galaxy J7 V (2018) also has an external memory slot that allows up to 400 GB.
HTC One M9 has a quite better performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also has an extra GPU, a 64-bits processor and a greater amount of RAM memory. HTC One M9 features a much better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a back camera with a much better 20 MP resolution and a much better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the HTC One M9 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.